| Author | same one different guise? |
Aunty Mor
Member
Posts: 294
Joined: 28.12.06
 | | Posted on 22-01-2007 12:00 | |
|
Image 491921. I am sure this is the same one I asked to be deleted yesterday that has popped up again in a different format. Also take a note of the ones that have commented on it. I have been doing a bit of investigating and they all have something to do with several websites that I don't think have the best interests of the OMM at heart. Checkout the following:
Anonymous is furry = furry creatures in porn pictures
7chan, 4chan= some kind of group that raids websites, seems to get shut down quite regularly
poolside.com.. Is mentioned on verious images on here seems to stem from the above. Some kind of leader
Shoop da Whoop images= some connection with the above as is Richard Mongler who's name appears in various formats on several images. Other images on here also tie in. Anything with/b/ or DESU or /i/ which seems to stand for invasion. Have a look and see what you think. |
|
| Author | RE: same one different guise? |
Aunty Mor
Member
Posts: 294
Joined: 28.12.06
| | Posted on 22-01-2007 12:04 | |
|
| Just found another one that ties in with this 7chan. Image no. 400751. This needs to go too! |
|
| Author | RE: same one different guise? |
Paul Fisher
Super Administrator
Posts: 277
Joined: 25.06.06
 | | Posted on 22-01-2007 23:16 | |
|
| We have our eye on this group. All images that fall foul of our terms and conditions are being removed. |
|
| Author | RE: same one different guise? |
Aunty Mor
Member
Posts: 294
Joined: 28.12.06
| | Posted on 22-01-2007 23:38 | |
|
Oh.  Hi Paul. Sorry to have gone on a bit there but they all seemed to turn up overnight. Didn't know if anyone had noticed cos they were all still there hours later. |
|
| Author | RE: same one different guise? |
Nate Farrington
Member
Posts: 3
Joined: 23.01.07
 | | Posted on 23-01-2007 20:24 | |
|
Why are you guys so determined to get rid of all the good pics. I would rather see a million Shoop da Whoops then most of the pics here. A guy can only take so many peace signs befor he has the urge to brutaly murder someone.
|
|
| Author | RE: same one different guise? |
Marjolein Mallee
Member
Posts: 39
Joined: 18.01.07
 | | Posted on 23-01-2007 20:36 | |
|
Nate Farrington wrote:
Why are you guys so determined to get rid of all the good pics. I would rather see a million Shoop da Whoops then most of the pics here. A guy can only take so many peace signs befor he has the urge to brutaly murder someone.
1 million induviduals, not 50 times the same person if this is the case with these pictures. thats not the goal of OMM |
|
| Author | RE: same one different guise? |
Nate Farrington
Member
Posts: 3
Joined: 23.01.07
| | Posted on 23-01-2007 20:45 | |
|
Most of them are probably not the same person. There are allot of channers. Like, millions of them.
I'm just the only one stupid enough to post here, thereby destroying my anonymity and becoming a namefag.
I better go become An Hero now.
Edited by Nate Farrington on 23-01-2007 20:48 |
|
| Author | RE: same one different guise? |
Paul Fisher
Super Administrator
Posts: 277
Joined: 25.06.06
| | Posted on 23-01-2007 21:06 | |
|
Hi Nate, thanks for your post.
We want to embrace all elements of modern society through our little pictures, however there are certain goals and principles that are central to the concept. One of them is that we need to be able to verify each person - this is a requirement for the World Record we are trying to break and will be checked by Guinness World Records. Many of the Chan posters are completely anonymous and contain fictitious details which is against the spirit of the project. If you want to make a statement within the OMM project then be brave enough to put your name to it.
There are still a huge number of Chan pictures within the OMM - and all of these guys have stuck to the rules. It's not that we want to get rid of duplicate images, it's simply a case of following our founding principles.
Hope that helps. |
|
| Author | RE: same one different guise? |
Timo Jääskeläinen
Member
Posts: 76
Joined: 06.01.07
 | | Posted on 23-01-2007 21:39 | |
|
| I am just curious, how exactly will you verify each person? For example, would my account count for the world record or do I have to change to my real name? I find it quite impossible to actually verify every single person out of one million. I'm interested. |
|
| Author | RE: same one different guise? |
Paul Fisher
Super Administrator
Posts: 277
Joined: 25.06.06
| | Posted on 23-01-2007 22:26 | |
|
Full members are verified at the point of donation using their full address and payment details.
In an ideal world all members would be full members, and therefore would have been through the verification process. This is one reason why full members will begin replacing free members as we approach our goal.
Of the free members that are left a sample will be taken and verified against postal code, ip, email and name information. Those with fake details will be discounted by the verification team, which will lead to a certain % of free members being discounted from the record attempt. This is why we are so keen at this early stage to remove all accounts that are obviously false.
All sounds a bit complicated but it's all mapped out by the professional verification team behind the World Record attempt. |
|
| Author | RE: same one different guise? |
Aunty Mor
Member
Posts: 294
Joined: 28.12.06
| | Posted on 23-01-2007 23:41 | |
|
Nate Farrington wrote:
Why are you guys so determined to get rid of all the good pics. I would rather see a million Shoop da Whoops then most of the pics here. A guy can only take so many peace signs befor he has the urge to brutaly murder someone.
I have nothing against you, Shoop da Whoop images or the websites you are involved in. What I do have a problem with is the people within your websites who use it as cover for the own agenda. |
|
| Author | RE: same one different guise? |
Michelle Lau
Member
Posts: 7
Joined: 24.11.06
 | | Posted on 02-03-2007 23:20 | |
|
| Oh dear. I feel so very old... I had to google "Shoop da Whoop" to find out what on earth you were talking about lol |
|
| Author | RE: same one different guise? |
Angeli
Super Administrator
Posts: 129
Joined: 05.12.06
 | | Posted on 05-03-2007 02:29 | |
|
You're not old  Shoop da whoop isn't a very nice thing. Luckily, most people don't know about it. |
|
| Author | RE: same one different guise? |
Aunty Mor
Member
Posts: 294
Joined: 28.12.06
| | Posted on 15-03-2007 23:35 | |
|
Michelle Lau wrote:
Oh dear. I feel so very old... I had to google "Shoop da Whoop" to find out what on earth you were talking about lol
I had no idea what those pictures meant either when they turned up so I wikipedia'd them. I have learnt an awful lot of stuff since being on here. Its has been an eye opener in so many ways and when that lot turned up not in a good way. Happily to say most were removed although there are still some images on here that make me angry but unless they break any rules they will stay unfortunately. There is one image in particular that I find incredibly offensive. Just hope something really nasty happens to the person that drew it. Not death, wouldn't wish that on anybody but something very painful would be good! |
|
